Home
Attorney Profile
DUI
DUI FAQ's
DUI Resources
DMV FAQ
Field Sobriety Tests
Court Process
Expungements
Case Results
Testimonials
Contact Us

August 5, 2008

Things are not Always as They Seem Diabetes Can Cause False-Positive Results!

Things are not Always as They Seem
Diabetes Can Cause False-Positive Results!

 

Floyd Brown, a part-time resident of Port St. Lucie, Florida, was arrested and charged with DUI while chauffeuring students from South Florida to Orlando.  Approximately one hour into the trip, teachers on the bus became concerned because Mr. Brown wandered out of his lane.  One teacher used a cell phone to notify police of Mr. Brown’s behavior.  At the suggestion of the FHP officials, the teacher asked Mr. Brown to stop at the Fort Drum Plaza so that the students and faculty could use the restroom. 

 

While the bus was stopped at the plaza, all students left the bus and went into the plaza.  In the parking lot, Trooper Christopher Everett caught up with the bus and asked Mr. Brown to perform a field sobriety test.  Although Mr. Brown attempted to inform the officer that he suffered physical impairments that made it impossible for him to perform the test, he submitted to various field sobriety tests and failed them.  The police officers reported the “smell of alcohol” on Mr. Brown’s breath and requested that he complete a breath test.  Mr. Brown voluntarily submitted to a breath test which revealed only a slight trace of blood-alcohol content (0.014%) that even the administering test officer was surprised when Mr. Brown was actually arrested for DUI and transported to the Okeechobee County Jail. 

 

During trail, it was revealed that Mr. Brown had been in a serious automobile accident some years prior to the arrest, which resulted in his suffering long-term physical and balance problems.  Mr. Brown had also been diagnosed as being diabetic (although he was not aware of it at the time of his arrest).  Mr. Brown’s DUI defense attorney, Charles Shafer, was able to produce findings of various research studies whose results showed that diabetics can have a breath odor similar to alcohol.  In addition, the calibration of the breath test equipment was found to be faulty, which led to the minor detection of alcohol in Mr. Brown’s test.  After 18 months of having to deal with a drunk-driving charge, the case was dismissed. 

 

As an experienced California DUI defense lawyer, I have found that there are a number of medical conditions that cause individuals to exhibit some of the same signs as intoxication.  Diabetics will sometimes look and even act “drunk” to an observer and in many instances, certainly fail any field sobriety test given.   Thus, while Mr. Brown did in fact suffer other physical impairments which did not allow him to perform well on the field sobriety tests given, he most likely would have failed them anyway because of his diabetes.  The fact that Mr. Brown is diabetic also is what most likely attributed to his “wandering” out of his lane. 

 

While in Mr. Brown’s case the breath test results were found to be erroneous because the machine’s calibration was off, it is important to note that breath test machines do not actually measure alcohol.  Instead, they use infrared beams of light that are absorbed by chemical compounds (including ethyl alcohol) in one’s breath, which includes the methyl group in its molecular structure.  What this means is that the greater the absorption rate, the higher the blood-alcohol result will be.   Breath test machines are programmed to “assume” that the compounds in the breath are “probably” alcohol.  Nevertheless, this is simply not the case and this is where error can be found. As for the breath of a diabetic, it is well-documented that when a person is in a state known as “ketoacidosis,” a by-product of hypoaglycemia is that acetones will be produced in his or her breath.  This means that what the breath test machine is “assuming” to be alcohol is in fact not alcohol at all.

 

Being arrested for DUI is often a very frightful and confusing occurrence.  When it comes to the law, assumptions should never be made, and those facing drunk-driving charges should protect themselves from such assumptions.  If you are arrested for DUI, please contact the DUI Law Office of Thomas Wallin today!  Our California DUI defense lawyers represent individuals accused of drunk driving throughout Southern California, including Driving Under the Influence cases in Orange County , Los Angeles, Riverside , San Bernardino and San Diego.

 

For more information on Mr. Brown’s story visit: 

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2007/dec/15/30bus-driver-cleared-of-dui-charge/ and
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?s_hidethis=no&p_product=PBPB&p_theme=pbpb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_field_label-0=Author&p_field_label-1=title&p_bool_label-1=AND&s_dispstring=DUI%20charges%20AND%20date(11/01/2007%20to%2012/31/2007)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=11/01/2007%20to%2012/31/2007)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(DUI%20charges)&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no

July 1, 2008

Florida Motorist Arrested Twice for DUI While Sober

Florida Motorist Arrested Twice for DUI While Sober

 

Joseph Errichiello of Port Richey, Florida was pulled over last September at a DUI checkpoint and was charged with drunk driving after failing field sobriety testing.  Mr. Errichiello does not drink alcohol and willingly submitted to field sobriety tests administered.  After failing the tests due to physical and mental disabilities, he willingly submitted to both a breath test and urinalysis.  He blew 0.00% according to the breath test and the urinalysis came back negative.  Despite these results, the Florida Highway Patrol placed Mr. Errichiello under arrest for drunk driving and the prosecutor moved forward with the case.  

Less than two weeks later, Mr. Errichiello was stopped again by a Pasco County Sheriff and charged with DUI.  Once again, he proved to be sober after testing.  Mr. Errichiello says that both times the police asked him if he had been drinking and he told them, “No.”  Apparently, he has had a learning disability since he was a child. Mr. Errichiello also stated in an interview with the Pasco Times that he had a severe diabetic condition which contributed to his failing the field sobriety testing.  After the second arrest, the prosecuting attorney did move to dismiss the DUI charges against Mr. Errichiello.

 

As a California DUI attorney, it does not surprise me that the police requested that Mr. Errichiello submit to the breath test and the urinalysis after his failing the field sobriety testing.  However, I was a bit surprised that the prosecuting attorney would want to move forward with its case after the breath test and urinalysis results showed that he was sober.  As a former Riverside County Public Defender, I know how easily the police can “mistake” the failing of field sobriety testing as one being intoxicated, but I do think the matter went a little too far.  Nonetheless, there are hundreds of people just like Mr. Errichiello who are unable to pass field sobriety testing because of physical and mental disabilities and conditions.  Sometimes individuals may not even be aware that they have a particular condition that affects how they would perform on such tests.  Moreover, individuals with diabetes sometimes will even fail breath testing because of their condition.  Thus, it is important that individuals arrested for driving under the influence  consult with an experienced DUI defense attorney as quickly as possible after their arrest so that such things can be uncovered. 

 

As a leading California DUI attorney, I know how to build a strong DUI defense, including hiring experts to show the courts how flawed field sobriety testing is and how unreliable one’s breath test result may be.  If you have been charged with DUI, contact the California DUI Law Firm of Thomas Wallin today.  Our skilled DUI defense attorneys represent individuals accused of drunk driving throughout Southern California, including Driving Under the Influence cases in Orange County , Los Angeles, Riverside , San Bernardino and San Diego.

 

For more on Mr. Errichiello’s story read:  http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=68874

December 30, 2006

Are Field Sobriety Tests Really Designed to Exonerate Drivers?

Any law enforcement officer or politician will tell you that field sobriety tests give drivers an opportunity to show that they are not impaired due to the consumption of alcohol.  Many people view field sobriety testing as a means for drivers to prove their innocence if they have been accused of drunk driving.  However, field sobriety testing is really used as a means of gathering evidence on the part of law enforcement officers.  Think about what happens at a DUI traffic stop – if a law enforcement officer believes you are impaired, he has already made up his mind about your innocence and will use field sobriety testing to try to gather evidence to support their assessment of your condition.  If a law enforcement officer asks you to submit to sobriety testing, he or she is going to see what is suspected.  If you stumble or trip, the officer is going to use it as evidence to back up the fact that he thinks you’re guilty of driving under the influence.  Another point to consider is that even people who have not been drinking may not do well on sobriety tests.  They often take place in the dark on roadways that may not be even or cared for well.  This combined with the fact that the headlights of cars driving by can cause people to stumble, means that not everyone can do well on sobriety tests even if they are not impaired.  It doesn’t seem fair that these tests can be used against drivers accused of driving under the influence, but that’s the way it works in the “land of the free.”  If you are arrested for driving under the influence, contact a Los Angeles DUI attorney as soon as possible so you have the best possible chance of having a positive outcome for your case.

Continue reading "Are Field Sobriety Tests Really Designed to Exonerate Drivers?" »

©2005 Thomas Wallin Law Offices

Disclaimer: The material and information contained in this website is provided solely for general informational purposes. The contents of this site should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter and is not a substitute for legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client, whether current or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting based on information at this site. The Thomas Wallin Law Offices expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site. Nothing in this website creates or establishes an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship can only be created or established by a written agreement signed both by client and attorney

Designed by Scorpion Design